Cổ điển - gay khiêu dâm từ quá khứ, tập 2
136,986 96%
9 năm trước đây
,jpeg/010/075/940/1280x720.9.jpg)
,jpeg/015/598/567/1280x720.6.jpg)
,jpeg/019/568/088/1280x720.5.jpg)
,jpeg/016/390/953/1280x720.6.jpg)
,jpeg/004/255/537/1280x720.6.jpg)
,jpeg/004/325/313/v2/320x180.210.jpg)
,jpeg/013/517/468/1280x720.10.jpg)
,jpeg/005/743/030/1280x720.10.jpg)
,jpeg/013/563/082/v2/320x180.203.jpg)
,jpeg/004/315/120/1280x720.1.jpg)
,jpeg/016/409/775/1280x720.9.jpg)
đến gnawinghunger : Yes, I had magazines of guys in the 70's wearing them. They were so hot. I started sucking cock at 10 with 2 neighborhood boys, then progressed to my local ABS when I was 15. The men there took me under their wing and got me working the Gh and using poppers. They would have house parties and invite me. Some of the best times ever.
Trả lời Hiển thị bình luận ban đầu
… wow - did rules dictate that you couldn’t do so much as kiss?! … Ugh, this is so arousing .. probably because of what ISN’T portrayed.. So many beautiful bodies.. yummy asses!
Trả lời
this video proves you don’t need to present explicit sexual activity to be arousing .. I love that this keeps you watching/ guessing .. will we be shown more!
Trả lời
gnawinghunger 1 năm trước đây
I remember the days of posing pouches, although I wasn't interested in men at that time. The nudist magazines would have pictures of people with their genital areas just totally smooth. It looked just like a toy doll. I was so glad when the magazines started showing nude people with their genitals on display. Unfortunately, today society ISN'T as proper thinking as it was in the period of, let's say, 1966 to the late 1970's as far as nudity is concerned. SAD, SAD, SAD!!!!
Trả lời
… a very interesting look at history.. am curious why (??) there’s no representation of any sexual activity - just hints, insinuations.
Trả lời